Article View: gnu.bash.bug
Article #763background jobs in 1.04
From: roy
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 1989 00:03
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 1989 00:03
16 lines
1030 bytes
1030 bytes
I'm running Bash 1.04, compiled with gcc v1.30 on a Sun3/60 with SunOS 4.0. I've just noticed that, if you put some jobs in the background and they've completed, it takes an execution of a non-builtin command (i.e. not the 'jobs' command) to make the shell realize that the jobs are actually complete. I don't see any reason why a builtin command shouldn't do this. The C shell will even notify you of job completion after you've typed a carriage return. Also, the C shell has a variable called 'notify', which when set, will asynchronously notify you that your background job is finished. How about if Bash had this too? Roy Bixler roy@sts.COM -or- ames!claris!sts!roy
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<278200004@sts>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!telly!ddsw1!lll-winken!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!usc!snorkelwacker!apple!claris!sts!sts!royShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!telly!ddsw1!lll-winken!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!usc!snorkelwacker!apple!claris!sts!sts!roy From: roy@sts.sts.COM Newsgroups: gnu.bash.bug Subject: background jobs in 1.04 Message-ID: <278200004@sts> Date: 22 Nov 89 00:03:08 GMT Lines: 16 Nf-ID: #N:sts:278200004:000:676 Nf-From: sts.sts.COM!roy Nov 21 15:33:00 1989