Article View: gnu.chess
Article #2069Re: CPUs at 30 Ghz in the year 2005
From: Bill
Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 21:43
Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 21:43
33 lines
2898 bytes
2898 bytes
>I dont think thats quite right. AFAIK you cannot use quantum entangled pairs >to transmit information. However the quantum effect that could be taken Why not? If you can arbitrarily set a quantum feature (like spin or wahtever) its quantum pair (presumably separated by a distance) will assume the other state. >advantage of is where an atom's spin exists in both directions simultaneously >until the point of measurement. This means that a single bit in a quantum That is what already occurs, quantum superposition. What I'm saying is, if you can set or even measure one, the other one automatically and instantly assumes the other state, surely this could be used to transmit information somehow. >computer is both 0 and 1 until the point that you read it[1]. But as you read it you might change it. See below. >[1] I think this is connected to Heisenbergs uncertainty principal and >Schrodingers cat. Well yes, they're all connected. Heisenberg's uncertainty said that you cannot find both the momentum (velocity) and position of a subatomic particle at the same time. This has to do with the necessary condition of disturbing the system (i.e., by photons or electrons from a microscope). Quantum mechanics is all probability (which Einstein hated, heh). My $0.02 worth - Bill
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<etpdgt4no5pu2j5re6sm35a67h06kr01ne@4ax.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!sunqbc.risq.qc.ca!wesley.videotron.net!news3.bellglobal.com!nf2.bellglobal.com!news20.bellglobal.com.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<PnWM6.120400$2_.38189249@news3.rdc1.on.home.com> <9e1g6o$4fs$1@oprah.cc.utexas.edu> <nui8gtg5pldctivjf57b35f73r5jme0tbl@4ax.com> <smyN6.7381$674.853537@news1.cableinet.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f52e8,8df9b986ca792ae5 X-Google-Attributes: gidf52e8,public X-Google-Thread: 1073e8,8df9b986ca792ae5 X-Google-Attributes: gid1073e8,public X-Google-Thread: 1035ff,8df9b986ca792ae5 X-Google-Attributes: gid1035ff,public X-Google-Thread: 10d71d,8df9b986ca792ae5 X-Google-Attributes: gid10d71d,public X-Google-Thread: 110df2,8df9b986ca792ae5 X-Google-Attributes: gid110df2,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-05-19 14:43:17 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!sunqbc.risq.qc.ca!wesley.videotron.net!news3.bellglobal.com!nf2.bellglobal.com!news20.bellglobal.com.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Bill <poo@somewhere.net> Newsgroups: gnu.chess,rec.games.chess.analysis,rec.games.chess.computer,rec.games.chess.misc,rec.games.chess.politics Subject: Re: CPUs at 30 Ghz in the year 2005 Message-ID: <etpdgt4no5pu2j5re6sm35a67h06kr01ne@4ax.com> References: <PnWM6.120400$2_.38189249@news3.rdc1.on.home.com> <9e1g6o$4fs$1@oprah.cc.utexas.edu> <nui8gtg5pldctivjf57b35f73r5jme0tbl@4ax.com> <smyN6.7381$674.853537@news1.cableinet.net> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 33 Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 21:43:17 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.231.109.133 X-Trace: news20.bellglobal.com 990308597 64.231.109.133 (Sat, 19 May 2001 17:43:17 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 17:43:17 EDT Organization: Sympatico