Re: rule

Article View: gnu.chess

Article #5037

#5037

From: eric frangulian
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 1994 10:56

30 lines
1714 bytes

In article <763346393.AA06807@bart.asstdc.com.au> David.Camp@f406.n712.z3.fidonet.org (David Camp) writes:

   Path: epita!julienas!EU.net!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!ihnp4.ucsd.edu!munnari.oz.au!yoyo.aarnet.edu.au!news.adelaide.edu.au!news.cs.su.oz.au!metro!asstdc.scgt.oz.au!asstdc!bart!fredmail
   From: David.Camp@f406.n712.z3.fidonet.org (David Camp)
   Newsgroups: gnu.chess
   Date: Thu, 10 Mar 1994 20:42:40 +1000
   X-FTN-To: All
   Lines: 6

>   Hi all, im new to the game, and my friends keep arguing about this one rule.
>   I'd like to know the answer. Can Kings take a piece when he's in check???


>			   Thanks David


	It depends if your piece is protected.

	You have three choice to do and you are in check.

	-1) Your king move.
	-2) You move a piece between the check's piece and the king.
	-3) You take the piece ( if you are not in check after ).

	If you are in opening, try, not to move your king. And the other end during
	endings, move your check to help pawns.



				Eric

Technical Details

Message-ID: <FRANGU_E.94Mar14105650@argon.epita.fr>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!EU.net!julienas!epita!boson!frangu_e

References: <763346393.AA06807@bart.asstdc.com.au>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10d71d,438135c57a9a6378
X-Google-Attributes: gid10d71d,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-03-14 02:56:49 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!EU.net!julienas!epita!boson!frangu_e
From: frangu_e@argon.epita.fr (eric frangulian)
Newsgroups: gnu.chess
Subject: Re: rule
Date: 14 Mar 1994 10:56:49 GMT
Organization: Epita (French engineering school)
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <FRANGU_E.94Mar14105650@argon.epita.fr>
References: <763346393.AA06807@bart.asstdc.com.au>
NNTP-Posting-Host: argon.epita.fr
In-reply-to: David.Camp@f406.n712.z3.fidonet.org's message of Thu, 10 Mar 1994 20:42:40 +1000

Reply to Parent Message