Article View: gnu.chess
Article #5063New PawnValue for pl69...better or WORSE?
From: Roger Uzun
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 1994 03:55
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 1994 03:55
14 lines
1193 bytes
1193 bytes
I noticed the new pawnvalue routine in eval.c is a lot slower (in early game) than the one in 4pl68, it also leads to quite different play, especially early on. Turn the book off and set it to 5 or 6 ply and watch how different the choices are vs 4pl68. Can anyone elaborate on why the 4pl69 routine would be better than the 4pl68 routine (PawnValue) What was it suppose to "fix" -Roger -------------------------------------------------------------- bix: ruzun NET: uzun@crash.cts.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<CnGLL8.Jwp@crash.cts.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!news.cac.psu.edu!news.pop.psu.edu!ctc.com!birdie-blue.cis.pitt.edu!dsinc!netnews.upenn.edu!msuinfo!agate!ihnp4.ucsd.edu!usc!crash!uzunShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10d71d,9e67f4e43c91e8fa,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10d71d,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-03-29 19:55:56 PST Newsgroups: gnu.chess Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!news.cac.psu.edu!news.pop.psu.edu!ctc.com!birdie-blue.cis.pitt.edu!dsinc!netnews.upenn.edu!msuinfo!agate!ihnp4.ucsd.edu!usc!crash!uzun From: uzun@crash.cts.com (Roger Uzun) Subject: New PawnValue for pl69...better or WORSE? Organization: CTS Network Services (CTSNET/crash), San Diego, CA Date: Wed, 30 Mar 1994 03:55:56 GMT Message-ID: <CnGLL8.Jwp@crash.cts.com> Sender: news@crash.cts.com (news subsystem) Nntp-Posting-Host: crash.cts.com Lines: 14