Article View: gnu.chess
Article #50844PL67 a step backward?
From: Roger Uzun
Date: Sat, 05 Feb 1994 20:44
Date: Sat, 05 Feb 1994 20:44
24 lines
1432 bytes
1432 bytes
Well, having perused the pl67 files, it is apparent that there have been wholesale changes to almost everything in the pgm. Has anyone had time to test out the new code, the 4PL67 stuff? Does it seem stronger? What about all the bug fixes and enhancements mentioned here, by Kong Sian and others, have these been ignored in the 4PL67 code? The changelog and readme say nothing about what makes 4PL67 better than previous versions. Even endgame code seems changed drastically and it was only recently changed. Can someone fill in the details of what is different/better in 4PL67, did it use any of the 4PL66 improvements. I am afraid we have 2 distinct efforts here, and perhaps going to 4PL67 will be a step backward. -Roger -------------------------------------------------------------- bix: ruzun NET: uzun@crash.cts.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<CKrqxJ.Fwv@crash.cts.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!cs.utexas.edu!usc!crash!uzunShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10d71d,228b97e5c83c05db,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10d71d,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-02-06 12:23:36 PST Newsgroups: gnu.chess Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!cs.utexas.edu!usc!crash!uzun From: uzun@crash.cts.com (Roger Uzun) Subject: 4PL67 a step backward? Organization: CTS Network Services (CTSNET/crash), San Diego, CA Date: Sat, 5 Feb 1994 20:44:05 GMT Message-ID: <CKrqxJ.Fwv@crash.cts.com> Sender: news@crash.cts.com (news subsystem) Nntp-Posting-Host: crash.cts.com Lines: 24