Article View: gnu.chess
Article #5142Re: KILLT & HISTORY
From: Jacques Grove
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 1994 12:48
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 1994 12:48
25 lines
1526 bytes
1526 bytes
Chua Kong Sian (nsrccks@leonis.nus.sg) wrote: : At present, the KILLT and HISTORY heuristics overlapped (see genmoves.c). : I would like to suggest that these two heuristics be separated. Let : HISTORY only refer to history data and nothing to do with killer moves. : What this means is that in MoveList() and VMoveList(), those #ifdef : HISTORY blocks should be commented out (or removed). [rest deleted] I would like to ask a question here. Isn't the history heuristic supposed to be much better than the killer heuristic? I seem to recall an article by J. Schaeffer (sp?) some (actually many) years ago in which this was asserted (and there were also some experimental data given to back this up). Is this true? And if so, why is the killer heuristic still in Gnuchess? Jacques University of Stellenbosch SOUTH AFRICA INTERNET: grovej@itu.sun.ac.za / grovej@cs.sun.ac.za
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<2kaajh$s43@itu1.sun.ac.za>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ee.und.ac.za!hippo.ru.ac.za!itu1.sun.ac.za!grovejReferences:
<2k4c9u$ivn@nuscc.nus.sg>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10d71d,316f8ea222d08d03 X-Google-Attributes: gid10d71d,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-02-21 04:48:49 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ee.und.ac.za!hippo.ru.ac.za!itu1.sun.ac.za!grovej From: grovej@cs.sun.ac.za (Jacques Grove) Newsgroups: gnu.chess Subject: Re: KILLT & HISTORY Date: 21 Feb 1994 12:48:49 GMT Organization: University of Stellenbosch Lines: 25 Message-ID: <2kaajh$s43@itu1.sun.ac.za> References: <2k4c9u$ivn@nuscc.nus.sg> NNTP-Posting-Host: itu1.sun.ac.za X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]