KILLT vs HISTORY

Article View: gnu.chess

Article #5149

#5149

From: Roger Uzun
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 1994 01:35

11 lines
973 bytes

On my machine KILLT is faster than HISTORY, and I thought they
were equivalent logically, does anyone know if HISTORY
is indeed preferable to KILLT, despite the speed penalty
caused by using HISTORY (even with the fix/enhancement
posted here by Kong Sian).

-Roger
--------------------------------------------------------------
bix: ruzun
NET: uzun@crash.cts.com

Technical Details

Message-ID: <CLLr2J.K4p@crash.cts.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!udel!news.sprintlink.net!crash!uzun

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10d71d,11efa983c5588676,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid10d71d,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-02-21 17:35:06 PST
Newsgroups: gnu.chess
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!udel!news.sprintlink.net!crash!uzun
From: uzun@crash.cts.com (Roger Uzun)
Subject: KILLT vs HISTORY
Organization: CTS Network Services (CTSNET/crash), San Diego, CA
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 1994 01:35:06 GMT
Message-ID: <CLLr2J.K4p@crash.cts.com>
Sender: news@crash.cts.com (news subsystem)
Nntp-Posting-Host: crash.cts.com
Lines: 11