Re: KILLT vs HISTORY

Article View: gnu.chess

Article #5153

#5153

From: Roger Uzun
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 1994 16:24

9 lines
916 bytes

Should we use BOTH KILLT and HISTORY?  I use just -DKILLT and it
is faster for a given board (fixed depth search times) than
using -DHISTORY only.

Which would be best?
-Roger
--------------------------------------------------------------
bix: ruzun
NET: uzun@crash.cts.com

Technical Details

Message-ID: <CLMw9p.2CM@crash.cts.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!crash!uzun

References: <CLLr2J.K4p@crash.cts.com> <2kc4fc$rr3@nuscc.nus.sg>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10d71d,11efa983c5588676
X-Google-Attributes: gid10d71d,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-02-22 08:24:59 PST
Newsgroups: gnu.chess
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!crash!uzun
From: uzun@crash.cts.com (Roger Uzun)
Subject: Re: KILLT vs HISTORY
Organization: CTS Network Services (CTSNET/crash), San Diego, CA
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 1994 16:24:59 GMT
Message-ID: <CLMw9p.2CM@crash.cts.com>
References: <CLLr2J.K4p@crash.cts.com> <2kc4fc$rr3@nuscc.nus.sg>
Sender: news@crash.cts.com (news subsystem)
Nntp-Posting-Host: crash.cts.com
Lines: 9

Reply to Parent Message