Re: GNUChess v3 and v4

Article View: gnu.chess

Article #5157

#5157

From: Charles Waltemath
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 1994 03:26

6 lines
1031 bytes

i Anyone who has problems with a chess program because it cannot tolerate
multiple "undo" moves shouldn't be playing competetive chess.  When have any
ones human opponents tolerated such?

That is certainly NO weakness in a chess program, in fact even allowing undo's is
is a weakness of the program!

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1994Feb25.032650.15506@ohsu.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!biosci!steele!clw

References: <2jdp0k$icj@news.kth.se> <2k4dua$5od@samba.oit.unc.edu> <CLHzJt.35G@lut.ac.uk>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 107f5a,3a70d49b69ebe909
X-Google-Attributes: gid107f5a,public
X-Google-Thread: 10d71d,99b48f290ed1f6af
X-Google-Attributes: gid10d71d,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-02-24 19:26:50 PST
Newsgroups: gnu.chess,comp.sys.mac.games
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!biosci!steele!clw
From: clw@ohsu.edu (Charles Waltemath)
Subject: Re: GNUChess v3 and v4
Message-ID: <1994Feb25.032650.15506@ohsu.edu>
Sender: news@ohsu.edu
Nntp-Posting-Host: sellwood
Organization: Oregon Health Sciences University
References: <2jdp0k$icj@news.kth.se> <2k4dua$5od@samba.oit.unc.edu> <CLHzJt.35G@lut.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 1994 03:26:50 GMT
Lines: 6

Reply to Parent Message