Re: emacs bug (?).

Article View: gnu.emacs.bug

Article #100034

#100034

From: Kyle Jones
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 1990 21:13

10 lines
1098 bytes

ramani@VENUS.ME.JHU.EDU writes:
 > When editing a file, I killed a portion of the file, created a new
 > buffer, and then yanked the killed portion in the new buffer. When I
 > exited emacs it asked me whether I wished to save buffers, and I
 > answered yes to all the buffers, one by one. However the new buffer
 > which was created was not saved, (it did not ask "....save buffer
 > xxxxx.tex?" , where xxxxx.tex was the new bu buffer.

Maybe the time has come to make the default value of buffer-offer-save
be t.  What would this break?

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1990Mar12.211354.18391@talos.pm.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!talos!kjones

References: <9003091853.AA14180@life.ai.mit.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fb2f1,30be3fc03bded41a
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb2f1,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1990-03-12 13:13:54 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!talos!kjones
From: kjones@talos.pm.com (Kyle Jones)
Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.bug
Subject: Re: emacs bug (?).
Message-ID: <1990Mar12.211354.18391@talos.pm.com>
Date: 12 Mar 90 21:13:54 GMT
References: <9003091853.AA14180@life.ai.mit.edu>
Reply-To: kyle@cs.odu.edu
Lines: 10
Posted: Mon Mar 12 22:13:54 1990
Return-Path: <kyle@mist.cs.odu.edu>

Reply to Parent Message