bug in define-mail-alias

Article View: gnu.emacs.bug

Article #1022

#1022

From: Robert L. Krawitz
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 1988 21:33

12 lines
819 bytes

Well, for one it's easier to read the addresses in the outgoing mail
when names are included.  Also, it looks offhand like an address like

<foo bar@baz.quux>

is a legal address.  For three, why shouldn't emacs follow RFC822?

I think Michael's change is a good one.

harvard >>>>>>  |		Robert Krawitz <rlk@think.com>
bloom-beacon >  |think!rlk
topaz >>>>>>>>  .		rlk@a.HASA.disorg

Technical Details

Message-ID: <8809292133.AA17672@dagda.think.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!uunet!bu-cs!bloom-beacon!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!THINK.COM!rlk

References: <8809292043.AA23986@apple.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!uunet!bu-cs!bloom-beacon!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!THINK.COM!rlk
From: rlk@THINK.COM (Robert L. Krawitz)
Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.bug
Subject: bug in define-mail-alias
Message-ID: <8809292133.AA17672@dagda.think.com>
Date: 29 Sep 88 21:33:12 GMT
References: <8809292043.AA23986@apple.com>
Sender: daemon@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu
Distribution: gnu
Organization: GNUs Not Usenet
Lines: 12

Reply to Parent Message