Article View: gnu.emacs.bug
Article #1176Re: chmod 777
From: Jacob Levy
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 1988 17:23
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 1988 17:23
17 lines
1339 bytes
1339 bytes
In article <8811142028.AA00709@sugar-bombs.ai.mit.edu> rms@WHEATIES.AI.MIT.EDU (Richard Stallman) writes: >I do not believe it is a good thing to have security among the users >of a computer system. If I were to distribute files that set the mode >to something other than 777, I would in effect be promoting the practice >that I do not approve of. Therefore, I don't do it. Yes, but other systems may not subscribe to your beliefs. You're mixing two issues here: (a) the commendable desire to have free software like Gnu Emacs being in wide-spread use, and (b) Your desire to eliminate security and protection. Shouldn't it be possible to use Gnu Emacs (i.e. contribute towards your (a) goal) without subscribing to your (b) goal? Also, shouldn't you warn people about POSSIBLE security holes like the one mentioned, and others which (for all we know, we have not the time to read the code) are intentionally planted? --Jacob Levy
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<447@arisia.Xerox.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watmath!uunet!bu-cs!purdue!decwrl!sgi!arisia!jlevyReferences:
<8811142028.AA00709@sugar-bombs.ai.mit.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watmath!uunet!bu-cs!purdue!decwrl!sgi!arisia!jlevy From: jlevy@arisia.Xerox.COM (Jacob Levy) Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.bug Subject: Re: chmod 777 Message-ID: <447@arisia.Xerox.COM> Date: 16 Nov 88 17:23:45 GMT References: <8811142028.AA00709@sugar-bombs.ai.mit.edu> Reply-To: jlevy@arisia.UUCP (Jacob Levy) Distribution: gnu Organization: Xerox PARC Lines: 17