Article View: gnu.emacs.bug
Article #1240Controlling terminal of subprocesses under Sys V
From: munnari!sibyl.eleceng.ua.oz.au!i...
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 1988 18:15
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 1988 18:15
101 lines
3605 bytes
3605 bytes
In GNU Emacs 18.52.16 of Sun Dec 11 1988 on sibyl (usg-unix-v)
The controlling terminal of an emacs subprocess is not set properly
when running under Sys V with pseudo-terminal drivers.
To do this correctly the child must call setpgrp and then open the
pseudo tty in that order. I have made the following changes which seem
to work. It doesn't seem possible to confine the system dependancy to
setpgrp_of_tty.
In process.c:
Was
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
#ifdef TIOCNOTTY
/* In 4.3BSD, the TIOCSPGRP bug has been fixed, and now you
can do TIOCSPGRP only to the process's controlling tty.
We must make the pty terminal the controlling tty of the child. */
if (ptyname)
{
/* I wonder: would just ioctl (0, TIOCNOTTY, 0) work here?
I can't test it since I don't have 4.3. */
int j = open ("/dev/tty", O_RDWR, 0);
ioctl (j, TIOCNOTTY, 0);
close (j);
#if !defined (RTU) && !defined(UNIPLUS)
#ifdef USG
setpgrp ();
#endif
/* I wonder if close (open (ptyname, ...)) would work? */
if (xforkin >= 0)
close (xforkin);
xforkout = xforkin = open (ptyname, O_RDWR, 0);
if (xforkin < 0)
abort ();
#endif /* not UNIPLUS and not RTU */
}
#endif /* TIOCNOTTY */
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Change to:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
/* In 4.3BSD, the TIOCSPGRP bug has been fixed, and now you
can do TIOCSPGRP only to the process's controlling tty.
We must make the pty terminal the controlling tty of the child. */
if (ptyname)
{
#ifdef TIOCNOTTY
/* I wonder: would just ioctl (0, TIOCNOTTY, 0) work here?
I can't test it since I don't have 4.3. */
int j = open ("/dev/tty", O_RDWR, 0);
ioctl (j, TIOCNOTTY, 0);
close (j);
#endif /* TIOCNOTTY */
#if !defined (RTU) && !defined(UNIPLUS)
#ifdef USG
setpgrp ();
#endif
/* I wonder if close (open (ptyname, ...)) would work? */
if (xforkin >= 0)
close (xforkin);
xforkout = xforkin = open (ptyname, O_RDWR, 0);
if (xforkin < 0)
abort ();
#endif /* not UNIPLUS and not RTU */
}
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
And in callproc.c
Was:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
#ifdef USG
setpgrp (); /* No arguments but equivalent in this case */
#else
setpgrp (pid, pid);
#endif /* USG */
setpgrp_of_tty (pid);
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Change to:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
#ifdef USG
#if defined(HAVE_PTYS) && !defined(RTU) && !defined(UNIPLUS)
{
extern char *ptyname;
if (!ptyname) setpgrp ();
}
#else
setpgrp (); /* No arguments but equivalent in this case */
#endif
#else
setpgrp (pid, pid);
#endif /* USG */
setpgrp_of_tty (pid);
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8812111638.AA12873@uunet.UU.NET>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watmath!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!UUNET.UU.NET!munnari!sibyl.eleceng.ua.oz.au!ianShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watmath!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!UUNET.UU.NET!munnari!sibyl.eleceng.ua.oz.au!ian From: munnari!sibyl.eleceng.ua.oz.au!ian@UUNET.UU.NET Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.bug Subject: Controlling terminal of subprocesses under Sys V Message-ID: <8812111638.AA12873@uunet.UU.NET> Date: 11 Dec 88 18:15:03 GMT Sender: daemon@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu Distribution: gnu Organization: GNUs Not Usenet Lines: 101