re: Emacs 19 and Alpha

Article View: gnu.emacs.bug

Article #87626

#87626

From: Richard Stallman
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 1994 06:13

16 lines
1338 bytes

    Then what about the fact that there are two GNU Emacs'? Does it reduces
    the chances that tty support will be implemented in Lucid GNU Emacs (aka
    XEmacs)? Does it reduce the chance that GNU Emacs (the one by FSF) will
    have support for variable height/width fonts?

I don't know.

But I do have to say that the people maintaining Lucid Emacs in the
past did not pay attention to the issue of getting legal papers for
code they install.

That is taking a risk.  Maybe nothing bad will happen--or maybe a
disaster.

I hope that the present maintainers of Lucid Emacs will start
cooperating with the FSF at least in regard to this issue.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <9409130608.AA12108@mole.gnu.ai.mit.edu>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!gnu.ai.mit.edu!rms

References: <"29768_Mon_Sep_12_11:48:41_1994"@bnr.ca>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fb2f1,9b056eea8ff54c17
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb2f1,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-09-12 23:46:04 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!gnu.ai.mit.edu!rms
From: rms@gnu.ai.mit.edu (Richard Stallman)
Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.bug
Subject: re: Emacs 19 and Alpha
Date: 13 Sep 1994 02:13:02 -0400
Organization: GNUs Not Usenet
Lines: 18
Sender: daemon@cis.ohio-state.edu
Approved: bug-gnu-emacs@prep.ai.mit.edu
Distribution: gnu
Message-ID: <9409130608.AA12108@mole.gnu.ai.mit.edu>
References: <"29768_Mon_Sep_12_11:48:41_1994"@bnr.ca>

Reply to Parent Message