Article View: gnu.emacs.bug
Article #88061[19.25.92] slow frame creation
From: Erik Naggum
Date: Sun, 07 Aug 1994 04:27
Date: Sun, 07 Aug 1994 04:27
49 lines
2727 bytes
2727 bytes
In GNU Emacs 19.25.92.2 (sparc-sun-sunos4shr) of Wed Aug 3 1994 on naggum.no
the x_sync loop at the end of x_make_frame_visible is causing occasional
delays when new frames are created. special-display-buffer-frames is bound
to '("*compilation*" "*Help*")), and it sometimes takes a noticeable amount
of time from when a frame is created and displayed until it is filled with
the desired text. "noticeable" is in the 200-500 ms range. since this is
obviously a timing issue, I have been unable to reproduce it consistently
enough to find out if x_sync() itself is the culprit, but in the course of
searching, I noticed that Emacs will (sleep-for 1 0) or (sleep-for 0 250)
the first time through the x_sync loop. at least this has a simple fix:
*** src/xterm.c.~1~ Tue Jul 26 23:56:48 1994
--- src/xterm.c Wed Aug 3 03:57:02 1994
***************
*** 5684,5692 ****
so that incoming events are handled. */
{
Lisp_Object frame;
! int one_in_four = 0;
XSET (frame, Lisp_Frame, f);
while (! f->async_visible)
{
--- 5684,5692 ----
so that incoming events are handled. */
{
Lisp_Object frame;
! int one_in_four = 1;
XSET (frame, Lisp_Frame, f);
while (! f->async_visible)
{
I don't know what problem the original x_sync loop fixed, since I didn't
experience anything wrong on my system before it. if I comment out the
code, *Help* doesn't show up in the tab for the window under twm until I do
something else, but no other problem occurs; display is fast. I didn't
have any problems before this even over a 14.4K SLIP link, but the new
x_sync() (or the loop) adds another three seconds to the time it takes to
get a *Help* window up. this isn't so nice.
what were the conditions under which this was necessary? can these be
determined so that other systems without those conditions do not need the
x_sync()?
best regards,
</Erik>
--
Microsoft is not the answer. Microsoft is the question. NO is the answer.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<19940803.3947@naggum.no>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!sun.cais.com!io.org!uunet.ca!uunet.ca!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!naggum.NO!erikShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fb2f1,bc6ba1c2c155313,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfb2f1,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-08-07 07:53:10 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!sun.cais.com!io.org!uunet.ca!uunet.ca!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!naggum.NO!erik From: erik@naggum.NO (Erik Naggum) Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.bug Subject: [19.25.92] slow frame creation Date: 7 Aug 1994 00:27:43 -0400 Organization: Naggum Software; +47 2295 0313 Lines: 50 Sender: daemon@cis.ohio-state.edu Approved: bug-gnu-emacs@prep.ai.mit.edu Distribution: gnu Message-ID: <19940803.3947@naggum.no>