Article View: gnu.emacs.bug
Article #892gdb-refresh
From: Eirik Fuller
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 1993 23:01
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 1993 23:01
22 lines
1371 bytes
1371 bytes
I seem to recall that some time ago I made a suggestion for gdb mode, and the response was something like "that sounds like a good idea, but we don't have time for it now; resubmit it later". Well, now it's later. :-) My suggestion concerns the binding of C-l in gdb mode. It seems that whoever devised this binding was unaware of the full behavior of the global binding of C-l; for a user who finds the global binding of C-l (recenter) far more useful for scrolling (as in M-0 C-l) than for refresh, the gdb mode binding of C-l is extremely annoying. Here's a replacement which does the same thing as the present gdb mode C-l binding in the absence of a prefix arg, and is more nearly consistent with the global binding of C-l. I would not object to improvements in the doc string. (defun gdb-recenter (arg) "Recenter, and redisplay the frame" (interactive "P") (gdb-display-frame) (recenter arg))
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<199301030901.AA01162@EARACHE.TC.CORNELL.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!wupost!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!elf.tn.cornell.edu!eirikShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.bug Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!wupost!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!elf.tn.cornell.edu!eirik From: eirik@elf.tn.cornell.edu (Eirik Fuller) Subject: gdb-refresh Message-ID: <199301030901.AA01162@EARACHE.TC.CORNELL.EDU> Sender: gnulists@ai.mit.edu Organization: GNUs Not Usenet Distribution: gnu Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1993 23:01:53 GMT Approved: bug-gnu-emacs@prep.ai.mit.edu Lines: 23