Article View: gnu.emacs.bug
Article #98950write-file
From: Phil Agre
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 1991 16:25
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 1991 16:25
11 lines
1019 bytes
1019 bytes
Suppose I am editing the file foo/quux, and I want to write out the buffer to the file bar/quux. Then I ought to be able to say: c-x c-w m-rubout b a r / return and have the filename default to bar/quux. Instead what happens is that it tries to write out the file to "bar/", i.e., with an empty filename. Would it violate some deep premise of the theory of filenames to have "foo/quux" + "bar/" = "bar/quux"? Phil Agre
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1984.9101151625@rsunp.cogs.susx.ac.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cogs.sussex.ac.uk!philaShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fb2f1,27510f18d5ad3c0a,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfb2f1,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1991-01-15 08:25:14 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cogs.sussex.ac.uk!phila From: phila@cogs.sussex.ac.uk (Phil Agre) Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.bug Subject: write-file Message-ID: <1984.9101151625@rsunp.cogs.susx.ac.uk> Date: 15 Jan 91 16:25:14 GMT Sender: daemon@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu Distribution: gnu Organization: GNUs Not Usenet Lines: 11 Approved: bug-gnu-emacs@prep.ai.mit.edu