Article View: gnu.emacs.bug
Article #99959bug?
From: pastor
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 1990 13:52
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 1990 13:52
47 lines
3506 bytes
3506 bytes
"...a command's intended definition may not be best for editing with." (section 29.3.1, GNU Emacs Manual, Fifth Edition, Emacs Version 18, October 1986). I posted a request to the GNU bboard, and got no useful responses, so I have to assume that the behavior I describe cannot be cured in any simple way. BTW, I did get one response that told me how to prevent GNU Emacs from spontaneously destroying windows when I enlarge other windows, and one response that said "If you find out how to do these things, please tell me, because they bother me too". There are many operations that I try to perform that cause GNU Emacs to *FORCE* me to respond to one or more questions; for example, if I 'touch' a c source file to force make to do a recompile (say, to recompile with a debug switch after a program bombs), when I try to edit the source file again GNU Emacs will not let me proceed until I respond to its "Are you sure?" message. Furthermore, in this and other situations, GNU Emacs forces me to respond "yes" or "no". In an editor that is supposed to be user-reconfigurable, and is supposed to be usable by both novice and expert users, I regard the inability to disable what I've come to call "Nag mode" as a serious bug. I want the ability to tell Emacs to warn me if I'm about to do something "stupid", but not to impede me. I want the ability to tell Emacs to permit me to type 'y' or 'n' in response to *ANY* question (i.e., always to act as though 'y-or-n-p' is being called, rather then 'yes-or-no-p'). Many of these behaviors are coded into the system, so simply redefining 'yes-or-no-p' so that it just calls 'y-or-n-p' doesn't work, and even if I could recompile with a switch that disabled them this is not appropriate: I should no more dictate to others that they live dangerously than Emacs should dictate to me that I be absurdly cautious. I have been a programmer for over 10 years, and have been using an Emacs look-alike (first FINE, then Unipress Emacs, now GNU Emacs) virtually the whole time; I don't want to be mothered by my editor -- if I say "do it" I want the editor to do it *UNLESS* I have specifically requested it to look over my shoulder. While I'm at it, nobody has been able to tell me how to cure another behavior that I also regard as a bug if it is not used-controllable. When I delete a window, I do not want the space thus liberated distributed among all other windows; I have arranged my screen the way I want it, and I don't want Emacs to mess with it. I want the space given up to the window above the one that is being deleted, as it is in Unipress Emacs. This behavior facilitates splitting a window to look around in a file that you're already editing, then getting rid of the window when you're done, a technique I used to use all the time until I switched over to GNU Emacs. Now it's such a pain to do it that I'm forced to jump around in the file within the same window.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9004121352.AA18442@gem>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!PRC.UNISYS.COM!pastorShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fb2f1,8642c59dcd01bbed,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfb2f1,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1990-04-12 06:52:13 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!PRC.UNISYS.COM!pastor From: pastor@PRC.UNISYS.COM Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.bug Subject: bug? Message-ID: <9004121352.AA18442@gem> Date: 12 Apr 90 13:52:13 GMT Sender: daemon@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu Distribution: gnu Organization: GNUs Not Usenet Lines: 47 Posted: Thu Apr 12 14:52:13 1990