Thread View: gnu.emacs.gnus
3 messages
3 total messages
Started by Steve Hamm
Wed, 16 Dec 1992 22:15
posting problem: no more processes, nntpd
Author: Steve Hamm
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 22:15
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 22:15
11 lines
940 bytes
940 bytes
I just switched NNTP servers, and now if I post something small it works (like a one-line test, or this note) but if I post something larger (say 100 lines) gnus hangs, saying "writing to process: no more processes, nntpd". Anyone see this before and/or have a fix? Thanks. --Steve -- Steve Hamm --- Motorola Inc. 3501 Ed Bluestein Blvd, MD-M2, Austin TX 78762 hamm@ssdt-bluestein.sps.mot.com UUCP: ...cs.utexas.edu!oakhill!austoto!hamm
Re: posting problem: no more processes, nntpd
Author: Steve Hamm
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 01:19
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 01:19
33 lines
2102 bytes
2102 bytes
I'm answering part of my own question.
---On Wed, 16 Dec 1992 22:15:08 GMT, hamm@ssdt-bluestein.sps.mot.com (Steve Hamm) said:
Steve> I just switched NNTP servers, and now if I post something small
Steve> it works (like a one-line test, or this note) but if I post
Steve> something larger (say 100 lines) gnus hangs, saying "writing to
Steve> process: no more processes, nntpd". Anyone see this before
Steve> and/or have a fix? Thanks.
I got into nntp.el and found the routine nntp-send-region-to-server. In
it is the following comment and code fragment:
;; `process-send-region' does not work if text to be sent is very
;; large. I don't know maximum size of text sent correctly.
(let ((last nil)
(size 100)) ;Size of text sent at once.
Since the value of size is empirical, I figured that I could try
decreasing it and see what happens. I got it down to 10 before things
were quite reliable.
Now, anyone care to tell me *why* this works? (Other hints: my
machine was just upgraded to a sparc 10 and the new nntp server is
apparently much slower than my old nntp server.) Seems like it must
be a handshake problem, but this fix seems rather inefficient --
anyone know a way of improving the efficiency, or a better workaround?
--Steve
--
Steve Hamm --- Motorola Inc. 3501 Ed Bluestein Blvd, MD-M2, Austin TX 78762
hamm@ssdt-bluestein.sps.mot.com UUCP: ...cs.utexas.edu!oakhill!austoto!hamm
Re: posting problem: no more processes, nntpd
Author: Paul Sammy 4th Year iE/CES
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 11:00
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 11:00
26 lines
1872 bytes
1872 bytes
>Regarding posting problem: no more processes, nntpd; hamm@ssdt-bluestein.sps.mot.com (Steve Hamm) adds:
> I just switched NNTP servers, and now if I post something small
> it works (like a one-line test, or this note) but if I post
> something larger (say 100 lines) gnus hangs, saying
> "writing to process: no more processes, nntpd". Anyone see
> this before and/or have a fix? Thanks.
Hmm, are you sure that the size of the posting matters?
I've had this message a few times, I just took it to mean that
the server machine was too busy to handle my post. I tried
again later and the posting was accepted.
> --Steve
--
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Internet: ssammy@cs.strath.ac.uk | JANET : ssammy@uk.ac.strath.cs |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| This .signature is infected. All viruses, places, events, ideas, viruses, |
| plants, viruses, and sexual viruses mentioned herein are viruses. Any |
| resemblance between the virusters and any person or viruses, living, |
| dead, or ... 8-{ ... living or dead is virusly coincidental. Virus. |
|____________________________________________________________________________|
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads