🚀 go-pugleaf

I have been using the standard hooks on supercite, and I noticed something
weird on include replies and forwards.  It is including part of the
header, which is might odd.  Here's an example message:

Return-Path:  <engb3cc@BUACCA.BU.EDU>
Reply-To: engb3cc@BUACCA.BU.EDU
To: jc@raven.bu.edu
From: engb3cc@BUACCA.BU.EDU (Jim Cameron)
Subject: None
Date: 10 Apr 1991  21:35:22
X-Mail-Agent: JCMAIL v2.0 11Nov90

hello there

And here is the include reply:

To: engb3cc@BUACCA.BU.EDU
In-reply-to: Jim Cameron's message of 10 Apr 1991  21:35:22 <9104110136.AA18666@BU.EDU>
Subject: None
FCC: ~/.outgoing-mail
--text follows this line--
 >>>>> On 10 Apr 1991  21:35:22, engb3cc@BUACCA.BU.EDU (Jim Cameron) said:
 Jim> X-Mail-Agent: JCMAIL v2.0 11Nov90
 
 Jim> hello there


This happens with both RMAIL and VM.  According to RFC822 (I believe that 
is the correct number) all mailers which want to add fields should use the
"X-" notation as it was decided that it would maintain integrity and not
ever use that as part of any other field.  

Any ideas?

JC

--
					-- James Cameron  (jc@raven.bu.edu)

Signal Processing and Interpretation Lab.  Boston, Mass  (617) 353-2879
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"But to risk we must, for the greatest hazard in life is to risk nothing.  For
the man or woman who risks nothing, has nothing, does nothing, is nothing."
	(Quote from the eulogy for the late Christa McAuliffe.)