Re: a smarter strtok(3)?

Article View: gnu.emacs.help

Article #2249

#2249

From: D'Arcy J.M. Cain
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 1995 11:33

11 lines
870 bytes

Sam Steingold (shteingd@math.ucla.edu) wrote:
>It doesn't look like strtok(3) will do the job, and I wonder if I'll
>really have to (re?)invent the wheel.

Nope.  Get xstrtok.c from http://www.druid.com/~darcy

-- 
D'Arcy J.M. Cain (darcy@ican.net)            |  Democracy is three wolves
Internet Canada Corporation                  |  and a sheep voting on
+1 416 364 1913     (DoD#0082)    (eNTP)     |  what's for dinner.
    -- Info on Internet Canada can be found at http://www.ican.net --

Technical Details

Message-ID: <DIp9Fo.8En@ican.net>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!ican.net!darcy

References: <nfu43qbipl.fsf@gauss.math.ucla.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help,comp.lang.c
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!ican.net!darcy
From: darcy@ican.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
Subject: Re: a smarter strtok(3)?
Message-ID: <DIp9Fo.8En@ican.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 1995 11:33:24 GMT
References: <nfu43qbipl.fsf@gauss.math.ucla.edu>
Organization: Internet Canada Corporation, Toronto, Canada
Followup-To: gnu.emacs.help,comp.lang.c

Reply to Parent Message