🚀 go-pugleaf

In <JBW.93Mar3205312@bigbird.bu.edu> jbw@bigbird.bu.edu (Joe Wells) writes:
>[...]
>The main reason that has been given for having not incorporating the FCC
>support within VM is that using the FCC feature is bad since it means not
>having the correct Message-ID for the sent message.  Using mail-self-blind
>instead has been suggested.
>[...]
Maybe I don't use FCC as other people are using it, but why would I
care about the Message-ID fields in the FCC file?  For my purposes, it
suffices to have the "standard" fields; after all, the file is used
simply to archive mail messages that I have sent out.  

Sure, the messages saved in the FCC file may not be full
RFC822-conforming messages, but as long as I can treat it like any
other folder with VM, I don't really care a whole lot.  Of course it
would be nicer if this folder was consistent with others, and had full
RFC822 headers, but is there a use for this?  Tell me what I'm
missing.

   Dan
-- 
==== message is author's opinion only -- it is not an official statement ====
J. Daniel Smith                              dsmith@ann-arbor.applicon.slb.com
Applicon, Inc.                               dsmith@aaaca1.sinet.slb.com 
Ann Arbor, Michigan (USA)                    AAACA1::DSMITH (SINet)