🚀 go-pugleaf

Jamie Zawinski writes:
 > So you're suggesting that when I want to resend a message to someone, I first
 > edit the message, and then resend it?  I don't like that very much because it
 > means I'm editing *my* copy of the message as well as annotating the copy I'm
 > going to send someone.  I don't want my original copy of the message altered
 > just because I'm shipping it elsewhere.

If I want to keep a clean copy I usually just dup the message
first--- "s~/INBOX" or some such.  Or I just use vm-forward-message.
Between vm-resend-message, vm-forward-message, and vm-send-digest
there should be a workable forwarding option for everyone.

 > Making "resend" leave you in a send-mail buffer really seems
 > like the rational thing to do; it's also a more consistent
 > interface.  The first time I used "resend" I was very
 > surprised that it just sent it off without any further
 > confirmation; no other VM mail- sending command does that.

This is how the command works in Elm.  Now obviously I don't
revere Elm other all other mailers, but its point 'n' shoot
solution to resending messages is a good one.  I want to keep it
simple.