Article View: gnu.emacs.vm.bug
Article #9415Re: bug in vm-move-message-forward/backward?
From: Steve Baumgarten
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 1991 17:04
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 1991 17:04
43 lines
2875 bytes
2875 bytes
In article <9110101842.AA25417@wendy-fate.UU.NET> kyle@wendy-fate.uu.net writes:
Ricardo Cardenas writes:
> Don't know if this has been reported before but vm-move-message-forward
> and vm-move-message-backward don't mark the mail/summary buffers as
> having been modified. Thus, changes made with them may not actually
> record any changes in the corresponding mail file when you quit VM (5.31
> beta).
The variable vm-retain-message-order controls whether the buffer will
be marked modified for message order changes. The default behavior is
to not mark the buffer modified (vm-retain-message-order non-nil and
non-t).
I'v had difficulty keeping moved messages moved, even when the
variable is set to "t". I tried rearranging my INBOX a bit, and it
worked just fine -- until I deleted a message. Once I did that, the
order reverted to the physical order of the INBOX. This is using VM
5.31 (as distributed, no local mods) under Epoch 3.2 + patches.
The message I deleted was not one that had been reordered (it was just
some newly grabbed mail that I wanted to get rid of), and as long as I
don't delete a message from the INBOX, everything is fine. Once I do,
however, I lose the ordering.
On this topic, would it make sense to have a command that physically
reorders the mailbox with the current ordering/grouping? It would
save some time reordering the mailbox each time it's opened, if
nothing else.
Also, a request. How about if you could mark a bunch of messages and
reorder them all at the same time? Or (perhaps easier to implement),
tell VM to drag along the next n messages, instead of having to do one
at a time. Just a thought, though. By the way, I really like the
interface for reordering messages -- very intuitive and easy to use.
Thanks for any help you might be able to provide.
--
Steve Baumgarten | "New York... when civilization falls apart,
Davis Polk & Wardwell | remember, we were way ahead of you."
baumgart@esquire.dpw.com |
cmcl2!esquire!baumgart | - David Letterman
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<BAUMGART.91Oct11130441@esquire.dpw.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!yale.edu!cmcl2!esquire!baumgartReferences:
<9110101824.AA00240@prsun1.pr.oracle.com> <9110101842.AA25417@wendy-fate.UU.NET>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f6829,d5569dca0eb20a35 X-Google-Attributes: gidf6829,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1991-10-04 05:58:20 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!yale.edu!cmcl2!esquire!baumgart From: baumgart@dpw.com (Steve Baumgarten) Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.vm.bug Subject: Re: bug in vm-move-message-forward/backward? Message-ID: <BAUMGART.91Oct11130441@esquire.dpw.com> Date: 11 Oct 91 17:04:41 GMT References: <9110101824.AA00240@prsun1.pr.oracle.com> <9110101842.AA25417@wendy-fate.UU.NET> Sender: news@DPW.COM Organization: Davis Polk & Wardwell Lines: 43 In-reply-to: kyle@wendy-fate.uu.net's message of 10 Oct 91 18:42:42 GMT