🚀 go-pugleaf

>>>>> On Wed, 7 Aug 91 19:26:07 +0200, Oliver Schoett
>>>>> <schoett@informatik.tu-muenchen.de> said in e-mail that I am
>>>>> gratuitously sending all over the internet :-) :

 > Hmmm, RFC 822 says:
 > 
 >             o   If the "Reply-To" field exists, then the reply  should
 >                 go to the addresses indicated in that field and not to
 >                 the address(es) indicated in the "From" field.
 > 
 > Seems the line to fix is:
 > vm-reply.el:480:      (insert "Reply-to: " mail-default-reply-to "\n"))

O> Well, RFC 822 also says:

O>         When matching any other syntactic unit, case is to be ignored.
O>         For  example, the field-names "From", "FROM", "from", and even
O>         "FroM" are semantically equal and should all be treated ident-
O>         ically.

O>         When generating these units, any mix of upper and  lower  case
O>         alphabetic  characters  may  be  used.  The case shown in this
O>         specification is suggested for message-creating processes.
O>  
O> So primarily it is the receiver's fault not to recognize 'to', but
O> it's certainly nicer of VM to follow the suggestion of 'To' when
O> generating the header.

O> Cheers,

O> Oliver Schoett	   Inst. f. Informatik (H2), Technische Univ. M"unchen
O> 		   Postfach 20 24 20,	  8000 M"unchen 2,     Germany
O> schoett@informatik.tu-muenchen.de    phone +49 89 2105-2390  fax -8207

Yup, something like "be narrow in what you send, but wide in what you accept."