Article View: gnu.emacs.vm.bug
Article #9505Re: buffer names after sending
From: Len Weisberg
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 1991 21:32
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 1991 21:32
13 lines
1194 bytes
1194 bytes
Piet van Oostrum writes: > I think the buffer name "sent ... to ..." should be highly sanitized. I heartily agree. Unsanitized names cause problems in several contexts. At least one reasonable start has been made at a table driven cleanup. How about making it a part of vm? I have heard the rationale that autosave should be made smarter in emacs itself, but that seems like a very unsatisfactory reason not to make vm itself less demanding on its environment, especially, as Piet demonstrates, it's not just autosave that has trouble with unsanitized names. - Len Weisberg - HP Corp Computing & Services - weisberg@corp.HP.COM
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<30920013@hpcc01.HP.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!spool.mu.edu!mips!sdd.hp.com!hplabs!hpcc05!hpcc01!weisbergReferences:
<9107111256.AA17163@alchemy.cs.ruu.nl>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f6829,99002e1df94dff37 X-Google-Attributes: gidf6829,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1991-07-12 04:00:11 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!spool.mu.edu!mips!sdd.hp.com!hplabs!hpcc05!hpcc01!weisberg From: weisberg@hpcc01.HP.COM (Len Weisberg) Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.vm.bug Subject: Re: buffer names after sending Message-ID: <30920013@hpcc01.HP.COM> Date: 11 Jul 91 21:32:45 GMT References: <9107111256.AA17163@alchemy.cs.ruu.nl> Organization: HP Corp Computing & Services Lines: 13