🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: gnu.emacs.vm.bug
Article #9718

vm-pipe-message-to-command should use marks!?

#9718
From: Mats Lidell TM/JUF 91753
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 1991 12:40
17 lines
989 bytes
Hi,

Why don't vm-pipe-message-to-command use marks? 

With marks it could mean that the messages are *concatenated* and sent
to the command. (This is very similar to saving them to a file and
this works(!) with marks.)

This would make unpacking of "multiple-part-stuff" much easier.

What do you think?

Yours
%% Mats Lidell 
etxmsll@juno.ericsson.se
PS. It would be convenient to use marks for feeding each marked
message to a new invocation of the command too. /DS
Technical Details
Message-ID: <9103061240.AA23244@juno.ericsson.se>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!wendy-fate.uu.net!bug-vm

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f6829,d28c3c65193500ff,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidf6829,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1991-03-07 01:52:04 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!wendy-fate.uu.net!bug-vm
From: etxmsll@juno.ericsson.se (Mats Lidell TM/JUF 91753)
Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.vm.bug
Subject: vm-pipe-message-to-command should use marks!?
Message-ID: <9103061240.AA23244@juno.ericsson.se>
Date: 6 Mar 91 12:40:28 GMT
Sender: bug-vm-request@uunet.uu.net
Lines: 17