Article View: gnu.emacs.vm.bug
Article #9718vm-pipe-message-to-command should use marks!?
From: Mats Lidell TM/JUF 91753
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 1991 12:40
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 1991 12:40
17 lines
989 bytes
989 bytes
Hi, Why don't vm-pipe-message-to-command use marks? With marks it could mean that the messages are *concatenated* and sent to the command. (This is very similar to saving them to a file and this works(!) with marks.) This would make unpacking of "multiple-part-stuff" much easier. What do you think? Yours %% Mats Lidell etxmsll@juno.ericsson.se PS. It would be convenient to use marks for feeding each marked message to a new invocation of the command too. /DS
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9103061240.AA23244@juno.ericsson.se>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!wendy-fate.uu.net!bug-vmShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f6829,d28c3c65193500ff,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf6829,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1991-03-07 01:52:04 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!wendy-fate.uu.net!bug-vm From: etxmsll@juno.ericsson.se (Mats Lidell TM/JUF 91753) Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.vm.bug Subject: vm-pipe-message-to-command should use marks!? Message-ID: <9103061240.AA23244@juno.ericsson.se> Date: 6 Mar 91 12:40:28 GMT Sender: bug-vm-request@uunet.uu.net Lines: 17