Re: lucid is smaller but faster?

Article View: gnu.epoch.misc

Article #1074

#1074

From: Darrell Schiebel
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1993 22:39

12 lines
1278 bytes

In article <HAHN.93Feb22105147@sunshine.labs.tek.com> hahn@sunshine.labs.tek.com (Doug Hahn) writes:
>
> I think the speed must depend on the style of use.  I've found on my
> sparc 2 that when using one screen per buffer, once I've gotten 6+
> buffer/screens, lemacs gets unacceptably slow when switching screens,
> to the point where it takes several seconds for a screen to raise.

	I too have experienced this. If there are any solutions, I'd
	appreciate hearing about them!

							thanks,
							Darrell Schiebel

Technical Details

Message-ID: <DSCHIEB.93Feb22173944@muse.cv.nrao.edu>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!wupost!darwin.sura.net!uvaarpa!cv3.cv.nrao.edu!cv3!dschieb

References: <HAHN.93Feb22105147@sunshine.labs.tek.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fc7ee,87c384af02974472,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidfc7ee,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-02-22 14:39:44 PST
Newsgroups: gnu.epoch.misc
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!wupost!darwin.sura.net!uvaarpa!cv3.cv.nrao.edu!cv3!dschieb
From: dschieb@muse.cv.nrao.edu (Darrell Schiebel)
Subject: Re: lucid is smaller but faster?
In-Reply-To: hahn@sunshine.labs.tek.com's message of 22 Feb 93 18: 51:47 GMT
Message-ID: <DSCHIEB.93Feb22173944@muse.cv.nrao.edu>
Sender: news@nrao.edu
Organization: National Radio Astronomy Observatory
References: <HAHN.93Feb22105147@sunshine.labs.tek.com>
Distribution: gnu
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1993 22:39:44 GMT
Lines: 12

Reply to Parent Message