Re: Separate minibuffer in the Epoch/Lucid merge

Article View: gnu.epoch.misc

Article #1084

#1084

From: Darrell Schiebel
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1993 19:14

15 lines
1421 bytes

In article <9302250023.AA11945@curley.osf.org> meissner@osf.ORG writes:
>
>  Jamie mentioned to me that the separate minibuffer feature might go
>  away when the greate epoch/lucid merge occurs.  I for one, and at
>  least some of my users would greatly prefer to keep a separate
>  minibuffer as an option.  It is so handy to have one large minibuffer,
>  particularly when you have smallish windows (say 40 columns or so),
>  and want to do a find-file-other-screen.

	I think this is a very handy feature; I always use a separate
	minibuffer with Epoch, and the lack of a separate minibuffer
	in Lucid Emacs makes me reluctant to switch. I would HATE
	to see this dropped.

							Darrell Schiebel

Technical Details

Message-ID: <DSCHIEB.93Feb25141414@muse.cv.nrao.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!rock!concert!uvaarpa!cv3.cv.nrao.edu!cv3!dschieb

References: <9302250023.AA11945@curley.osf.org>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fc7ee,eb824aff1801c135
X-Google-Attributes: gidfc7ee,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-02-25 11:14:13 PST
Newsgroups: gnu.epoch.misc
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!rock!concert!uvaarpa!cv3.cv.nrao.edu!cv3!dschieb
From: dschieb@muse.cv.nrao.edu (Darrell Schiebel)
Subject: Re: Separate minibuffer in the Epoch/Lucid merge
In-Reply-To: meissner@osf.ORG's message of 24 Feb 1993 20: 41:29 -0500
Message-ID: <DSCHIEB.93Feb25141414@muse.cv.nrao.edu>
Sender: news@nrao.edu
Organization: National Radio Astronomy Observatory
References: <9302250023.AA11945@curley.osf.org>
Distribution: gnu
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1993 19:14:13 GMT
Lines: 15

Reply to Parent Message