Article View: gnu.epoch.misc
Article #1100Another vote for a separate minibuffer
From: Bryan M Kramer
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1993 13:29
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1993 13:29
21 lines
1616 bytes
1616 bytes
I very much prefer the separate minibuffer. I've got it set up so that it automatically is raised whenever the focus enters any epoch screen. This makes it always ready and waiting when I'm in epoch. Some people have said that this is an unimportant issue. I disagree ... a separate minibuffer is much more important than a menu bar!!! BTW, I have a menu bar of sorts ... I have a wish application that has buttons for my favourite epoch commands and executes them via gnudoit. It's wonderful. Now if only there was a window manager that allowed me to tie the wish window to an epoch screen .... Re visual cues for input focus ... use olvwm --- it allows you to specify a separate frame color for the window that has the focus. It's wonderful. Actually, if you're using olwm there is no cost to move to olvwm and there are many benefits. |Bryan M. Kramer, Ph.D. 416-978-7330, fax 416-978-1455| |Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto | |6 King's College Road, Room 283E | |Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 1A4 |
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<93Mar2.082910est.133126@wotan.ai.toronto.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!agate!spool.mu.edu!torn!utcsri!relay.cs.toronto.edu!wotan.ai.toronto.edu!ai.toronto.edu!kramerShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fc7ee,8cff60b35e21abf0,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfc7ee,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-03-02 10:14:58 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!agate!spool.mu.edu!torn!utcsri!relay.cs.toronto.edu!wotan.ai.toronto.edu!ai.toronto.edu!kramer Newsgroups: gnu.epoch.misc From: kramer@cs.toronto.edu (Bryan M Kramer) Subject: Another vote for a separate minibuffer Message-ID: <93Mar2.082910est.133126@wotan.ai.toronto.edu> Date: 2 Mar 93 13:29:34 GMT Lines: 21