Article View: gnu.epoch.misc
Article #1704Re: Epoch vs. Sun 3
From: Brian L. Kahn
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 1991 19:11
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 1991 19:11
16 lines
1480 bytes
1480 bytes
In article <1991Dec20.102335.7577@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu>, tarvydas@turing.toronto.edu (Paul Tarvydas) writes: pt> We're trying to use Epoch on Sun 3/60's (and even a 3/50) under pt> Sunos 4.1.1. Epoch is very sluggish. We just build Epoch4.0a2. It's pt> even slower (compiled with gcc -O) than 3.2. Are we, please, doing pt> something wrong? Or should we just dump Epoch and go back to emacs? I used to have a sun 3/60; I think that epoch 3.2 runs just fine on that platform. Epoch 4.0 is definately slower, but this is an alpha release after all and will undoubtedly be tuned somewhat before it is a proper release. -- B< Brian Kahn blk@security.mitre.org "may the farce be with you"
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<BLK.91Dec20131120@vanity.mitre.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!ira.uka.de!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!spool.mu.edu!think.com!linus!linus!news!mbunix!blkReferences:
<1991Dec20.102335.7577@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu> <JCH.91Dec20113109@GS48.SP.CS.CMU.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fc7ee,92395000c9722421 X-Google-Attributes: gidfc7ee,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1991-12-20 11:11:20 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!ira.uka.de!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!spool.mu.edu!think.com!linus!linus!news!mbunix!blk From: blk@mitre.org (Brian L. Kahn) Newsgroups: gnu.epoch.misc Subject: Re: Epoch vs. Sun 3 Message-ID: <BLK.91Dec20131120@vanity.mitre.org> Date: 20 Dec 91 19:11:20 GMT References: <1991Dec20.102335.7577@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu> <JCH.91Dec20113109@GS48.SP.CS.CMU.EDU> Sender: news@linus.mitre.org (News Service) Distribution: na Organization: The MITRE Corp. Bedford, MA Lines: 16 In-Reply-To: jch@CS.CMU.EDU's message of 20 Dec 91 16:31:09 GMT Nntp-Posting-Host: vanity.mitre.org