Article View: gnu.epoch.misc
Article #1902ATT dependent routines
From: Jim Burnes - 235-7444
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 1991 21:40
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 1991 21:40
20 lines
1473 bytes
1473 bytes
Hi! I was wondering why certain parts of your code referenced memchr, memcpy, etc even though I specifically told the make process that I have a BSD machine. My suspicion is that sun machines have them even though they are primarily BSD based (or used to be anyway). Luckily I had an ATT compatibility library running around and after throwing that at it the compiler was happy. Is there a compile switch to get around this or was it just an oversight? (In any case...thanks....I love epoch!) Jim Burnes -----------------------------------+---------------------------------------- Jim Burnes, UNIX SysAdmin ! "The Nineties SWBell Advanced Technology Labs ! are gonna make the Sixties (314) 235-7444 ! look like the Fifties..." jburnes@swbatl.sbc.com ! Dennis Hopper in 'Flashback' -----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<m0jtQYY-0001hcC@swbatl.sbc.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!swbatl.sbc.com!jburnesShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fc7ee,d8b01aa905769ca8,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfc7ee,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1991-06-28 22:44:24 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!swbatl.sbc.com!jburnes From: jburnes@swbatl.sbc.com (Jim Burnes - 235-7444) Newsgroups: gnu.epoch.misc Subject: ATT dependent routines Message-ID: <m0jtQYY-0001hcC@swbatl.sbc.com> Date: 28 Jun 91 21:40:46 GMT Sender: daemon@cis.ohio-state.edu Distribution: gnu Organization: GNUs Not Usenet Lines: 20