epoch on Apollo Domain OS 10.2 ?

Article View: gnu.epoch.misc

Article #2069

#2069

From: Douglas K. Rand
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 1991 16:26

20 lines
1577 bytes

>>>>> Johan Bevemyr <bevemyr@sics.se> on 12/Apr/91 in [epoch on Apollo Domain OS 10.2 ?] writes:
> Has anyone managed to compile and run epoch on Apollo domain OS 10.2?
> 
> I could get it to compile with some warnings but when I tried to 
> run it I got the following reply
> 
> 	Fatal error (11).Segmentation fault

I've been running Epoch on SR10.3 for the last 4 months. It works
great. I haven't tried it under 10.2, but I'm using the same compiler
(v6.7) that is on 10.2. I didn't have any problems with the
distribution. Right now I'm using Epoch 3.2 with patches 1 & 2
installed.

Sorry I'm not more help.
--
Douglas Keenan Rand                Honeywell -- Air Transport Systems Division
Phone: +1 602 436 2814               US Snail: P.O. Box 21111 Phoenix AZ 85036
Internet: rand@ssdc.honeywell.com
UUCP: ...!uunet!asuvax!apciphx!hwcae!rand

Technical Details

Message-ID: <9104121626.AA04158@hwcae.cfsat.honeywell.com>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!unidui!math.fu-berlin.de!fauern!ira.uka.de!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!ucsd!ucbvax!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!unreplyable!garbage

References: <1991Apr12.090919.24817@sics.se>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fc7ee,e1e640b2df21fd3c
X-Google-Attributes: gidfc7ee,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1991-04-13 06:39:06 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!unidui!math.fu-berlin.de!fauern!ira.uka.de!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!ucsd!ucbvax!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!unreplyable!garbage
From: rand@hwcae.cfsat.honeywell.com (Douglas K. Rand)
Newsgroups: gnu.epoch.misc
Subject: epoch on Apollo Domain OS 10.2 ?
Message-ID: <9104121626.AA04158@hwcae.cfsat.honeywell.com>
Date: 12 Apr 91 16:26:48 GMT
References: <1991Apr12.090919.24817@sics.se>
Sender: daemon@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu
Distribution: gnu
Organization: GNUs Not Usenet
Lines: 20

Reply to Parent Message