Article View: gnu.epoch.misc
Article #2081Questions about epoch
From: Douglas K. Rand
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 1991 17:14
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 1991 17:14
63 lines
3471 bytes
3471 bytes
>>>>> Eystein Mathisen <eystein@hannibal.hsn.no > on 18 Apr 91 in [Questions about epoch] writes: > Could somebody tell me the basic features of epoch? As far as I know > it is a window-based, emacs-like editor (I may be wrong). Some > questions to guide your answers are: Epoch is not Emacs like. It is Emacs (version 18.55 to be specific). It does everything Emacs does with two exceptions: It does not handle dumb terminals. Int only works with X windows. It does not do batch processing. Because of these two reasons, we are still using Emacs too. > * Does it run under X on Apollo/Domain SR10.2 OS ? I'm not sure about 10.2. However, I'm using it with 10.3 with no problems. I would suspect it would work fine with 10.2. I have used it with the Xapollo server under 10.3, and this is pretty much the same environment as 10.2 with that X windows PSK. > * How much RAM is required to have a reasonable response ? I've got a DN4500 with 16 Mbytes. It is acceptable. But MUCH slower than regular Emacs. I wouldn't try it on anything less than 16 Mbytes, and a DN3500. You'd be looking for trouble on a 8 Mbyte DN3000. > * How many Mbytes of disk-space is required to install it ? My /usr/local/epoch directory is about 30 Mbytes when completly full. This includes all the object files, and a couple of executables for both the m68k and a88k. Cleaning things up will bring you down to 23 Mbytes or so. > * Is it an editor that can serve as a programming-environment > in a 1st year course in programming ? You might think about Emacs 18.57 with Leonard Zubkoff's GPR patches. It runs quicker, requires less memory, and is simpler. This is only a good option if you are running in a DM environment. If so, it is probably a better solution than Epoch. If you are running an X environment, Epoch, or Emacs for X windows will be better. > * Is it easy to learn ? You probably need somebody to become an expert, but once you have a locally customized environment, it shouldn't be too easy. The learning curve for Emacs isn't too steep, but it keeps on going up. You can use Epoch/Emacs with out too much trouble. > * Where can I get it (i.e. is it ftp-able or do I have to > purchase it) ? Epoch is available from cs.uiuc.edu via anonymous FTP. Emacs you can get almost anywhere. For the version from Leonard Zubkoff, try labrea.stanford.edu:/pub/gnu/apollo-emacs.tar.Z A note about the GPR version of Emacs 18.57: It only runs on SR10.2 and above. It will not run on 10.1. -- Douglas Keenan Rand Honeywell -- Air Transport Systems Division Phone: +1 602 436 2814 US Snail: P.O. Box 21111 Phoenix AZ 85036 NSFnet: rand@hwcae.cfsat.honeywell.com UUCP: uunet!asuvax!apciphx!hwcae!rand
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9104181714.AA25154@hwcae.cfsat.honeywell.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!fauern!ira.uka.de!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!emory!wrdis01!gatech!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!unreplyable!garbageReferences:
<1991Apr18.081728.14658@mack.uit.no>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fc7ee,856d4b63c4b18b30 X-Google-Attributes: gidfc7ee,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1991-04-18 23:26:26 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!fauern!ira.uka.de!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!emory!wrdis01!gatech!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!unreplyable!garbage From: rand@hwcae.cfsat.honeywell.com (Douglas K. Rand) Newsgroups: gnu.epoch.misc Subject: Questions about epoch Message-ID: <9104181714.AA25154@hwcae.cfsat.honeywell.com> Date: 18 Apr 91 17:14:45 GMT References: <1991Apr18.081728.14658@mack.uit.no> Sender: daemon@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu Distribution: gnu Organization: GNUs Not Usenet Lines: 63