🚀 go-pugleaf

I goofed in the last patch I sent, and had the test the wrong way.
The following patch against the original sources does the right thing.

Wed Nov  4 13:55:47 1992  Michael Meissner  (meissner@osf.org)

	* buffer.h (is_control_char, is_meta_char): Use unsigned test for
	doing ranges, which is faster, and causes GCC not to warn about
	'test is always true due to limited range' when given an unsigned
	argument in indent.c and xdispepoch.c.

*** buffer.h.orig	Wed Nov  4 15:50:56 1992
--- buffer.h	Wed Nov  4 15:49:27 1992
***************
*** 284,290 ****
  
  #define BufferSafeFloor(n) (BEGV <= GPT && GPT <= (n) ? GPT : BEGV)
  
! #define is_control_char(c)   (((c) >= 0 && (c) < 040) || (c) == 0177)
! #define is_meta_char(c) ((c) > 0240 && (c) <= 0377)
  
  extern void reset_buffer ();
--- 284,291 ----
  
  #define BufferSafeFloor(n) (BEGV <= GPT && GPT <= (n) ? GPT : BEGV)
  
! #define is_in_range(c,l,h) ((unsigned)((c) - (l)) <= (unsigned)((c) - (h)))
! #define is_control_char(c)   (is_in_range (c, 0, 037) || (c) == 0177)
! #define is_meta_char(c) is_in_range (c, 0241, 0377)
  
  extern void reset_buffer ();

--
Michael Meissner	email: meissner@osf.org		phone: 617-621-8861
Open Software Foundation, 11 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA, 02142

You are in a twisty little passage of standards, all conflicting.