🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <WALRUS.94Jan12115741@enchanter.ifs.umich.edu> walrus@umich.edu (Michael Shiplett) writes:
>
>  "ds" == Darrell Schiebel <dschieb@muse.cv.nrao.edu> writes:
>
>  ds> Say, does anyone know how the ``lemacs''/epoch integration is
>  ds> going... Has anyone worked on getting nonlocal mini-buffers in
>  ds> ``lemacs''?? Are people still using epoch, or are the three of us
>  ds> the only ones?
>
>    I'm still using epoch; mainly because I haven't had time to get the
>  menu-redrawing bug out of my compile of lemacs-19.8 nor the time to
>  attempt an FSF emacs-19 compile. I require a terminal-based version of
>  emacs and using Epoch ensures I don't have to worry too much about the
>  differences between (l)emacs 18 & 19 packages for when I use an
>  X-based and a terminal-based emacs. Unfortunately, it has also
>  prevented me from doing much in the way of upgrading to the "newer,
>  brighter, lemon-scented" versions of the packages I use (e.g., gnus).

	I've continued using it because of my attachment to the
	non-local mini-buffer in epoch. I've found it very useful,
	and I wish it were available in lemacs. Emacs19 allows
	non-local mini-buffers, but I don't think lemacs does.
	However, given the new features in lemacs, perhaps it's
	time to throw in the towel (or hack it into lemacs,
	I believe the stubs may be there).

						Darrell Schiebel