🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

1 total messages Started by Doug Bagley Tue, 02 Mar 1993 16:17
Re: Keep the Separate Minibuffer
#1105
Author: Doug Bagley
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1993 16:17
27 lines
2051 bytes
Gary Beckman writes:
> Allow me to also add my voice for the separate mini-buffer.  Those who
> don't like it in our shop tend to be those who use their X-server as a
> very large terminal emulator.  I put my mini-buffer at the top of the
> screen (heads up!), and run a minimum of fours screens below it. 

i'd vote for retaining the separate minibuffer feature too.  and, like
Gary, i like mine at the top of my screen, i don't ever overlap it
with other windows, so it's never hidden.  i've come to really like
knowing it's there, in one place, always available.

from the other messages posted on this subject, i find it curious that
some sites seem to go totally one way or the other for the minibuffer
location.  but, what the heck, it definately shows it's a matter of
personal preference, and since epoch/emacs is already so eminently
configurable to one's tastes, it would be too bad if a nice feature
like this were to go away.

Cheers,
Doug

"Excuse me, Worker, I'll just be a nanosecond."
-- a computer, from Firesign Theater's "I Think We're All Bozos On This Bus"
____________________________________________________________________
	     ... my brain, my thoughts, my words ...
Doug Bagley	   			       bagman@austin.ibm.com
IBM, Bldg 903, Rm 7C004, 11400 Burnet Rd. Austin, TX  (512) 838-8287 
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads