🚀 go-pugleaf

The code below produces this output from g++ 2.3.1, compiled for the
Sequent Symmetry and GAS:

g++ -V 2.3.1 test.cc
test.cc:10: inconsistent return types for method `extendable_array' in class `extendable_array<int>'
../cp-decl.c:9961: failed assertion `current_class_decl != NULL_TREE && TREE_CODE (current_class_decl) == PARM_DECL'
/usr/local/gnu/bin/gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1plus got fatal signal 4

It looks to me like these are two separate but related bugs; removing the
code for the destructor eliminates the failed assertion, but removing the
constructor and adding a null definition for it in the class declaration
allows the program to compile happily.

template <class T> class extendable_array
  {
public:
  extendable_array(int);
  ~extendable_array();
protected:
  void error_termination(char *msg);
  T *array;
  int current_size;
  };

template <class T> extendable_array<T>::extendable_array(int initial_size)
  {
  if( initial_size < 1 )
    error_termination("improper extendable_array initial size");
  array = new T[initial_size];
  current_size = initial_size;
  }

template <class T> extendable_array<T>::~extendable_array()
{ delete [] array; }

extendable_array<int> e(10);

main() {}