🚀 go-pugleaf

I usually use a cfront compiler, but suddenly i decided to run some code 
through a g++ compiler as a portability test. I got the following problem:
Consider the code:

class a
{
    public:
	int x;
	void SetX( int xi ) { x=xi; }
};

class b
{
    public:
	a y;
	void SetY( a *y );
};

void b :: SetY( a *y )
{

#ifndef gcc
    b :: y.SetX( y->x ); // This code does not compile under gcc. Line 20.
#else
    this->y.SetX( y->x );  // This code compiles under both compilers.
#endif

}

The problem is, of course,that the parameter called y hides b's the member
object y, and that problem is resolved by the notation b::y, only that this
does not work on gcc.

gcc-2.3.1 complains:

testing.C: In method `void  b::SetY (class a*)':
testing.C:20: object in '.' expression is not of aggregate type.

This seems to be a compiler bug.


-- 
	Jarand Roeynstrand			Phone: 	+47-7-597275 (EFI)
	EFI						+47-7-962355 (Home)
	N-7034 Trondheim		
	Norway					email: jr@efi.sintef.no