Article View: gnu.g++.bug
Article #1607Re: g++-1.32.0 segmentation fault
From: Doug Schmidt
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 1989 07:44
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 1989 07:44
26 lines
1581 bytes
1581 bytes
In article <69@cs.columbia.edu> fox@cs.columbia.edu (David Fox) writes:
|>
|>By the way, did anyone see my report about static objects in the scope
|>of a function being constructed on each entry to the function? Is it
|>real or is it me? Is it wrong or is it right?
|>
Well, I believe that you're not supposed to have static data objects
for classes with destructors. Check out the recent discussion
in comp.lang.c++ for details on why this is. Therefore, g++ is
wrong not to complain about them at compile time.
Here's the output from AT&T cfront for your program:
----------------------------------------
CC foo.C:
"foo.C", line 25: sorry, not implemented: local static n of class with
constructor
1 error
----------------------------------------
Doug
--
schmidt@ics.uci.edu (ARPA) | Per me si va nella citta' dolente.
office: (714) 856-4043 | Per me si va nell'eterno dolore.
| Per me si va tra la perduta gente.
| Lasciate ogni speranza o voi ch'entrate.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3434@paris.ics.uci.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!telly!ddsw1!lll-winken!uunet!bu-cs!bloom-beacon!oberon!orion.cf.uci.edu!uci-ics!glacier.ics.uci.edu!schmidtReferences:
<69@cs.columbia.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!telly!ddsw1!lll-winken!uunet!bu-cs!bloom-beacon!oberon!orion.cf.uci.edu!uci-ics!glacier.ics.uci.edu!schmidt From: schmidt@glacier.ics.uci.edu (Doug Schmidt) Newsgroups: gnu.g++.bug Subject: Re: g++-1.32.0 segmentation fault Message-ID: <3434@paris.ics.uci.edu> Date: 8 Jan 89 07:44:55 GMT References: <69@cs.columbia.edu> Sender: news@paris.ics.uci.edu Reply-To: Doug Schmidt <schmidt@glacier.ics.uci.edu> Distribution: gnu Organization: University of California, Irvine - Dept of ICS Lines: 26