Re: g++ 1.32 is lax on protection

Article View: gnu.g++.bug

Article #1636

#1636

From: George Beshers
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 1989 12:55

4 lines
566 bytes

I thought that was the point of `protected' vs. `private'.  If you change
to private you get the error.

				beshers@carcvax.brc.uconn.edu

Technical Details

Message-ID: <8901270021.aa08266@ICS.UCI.EDU>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watmath!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!PARIS.ICS.UCI.EDU!beshers%carcvax.brc.uconn.edu

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watmath!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!PARIS.ICS.UCI.EDU!beshers%carcvax.brc.uconn.edu
From: beshers%carcvax.brc.uconn.edu@PARIS.ICS.UCI.EDU (George Beshers)
Newsgroups: gnu.g++.bug
Subject: Re:  g++ 1.32 is lax on protection
Message-ID: <8901270021.aa08266@ICS.UCI.EDU>
Date: 26 Jan 89 12:55:18 GMT
Sender: daemon@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu
Distribution: gnu
Organization: GNUs Not Usenet
Lines: 4