Article View: gnu.g++.bug
Article #1667Re: g++ 1.32 is lax on protection
From: George Beshers
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 1989 18:41
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 1989 18:41
7 lines
755 bytes
755 bytes
So is 1.2.1 (!). I see your point. Actually, my belief is that you might want both possibilities. Consider a container object for a class X, then one possibility is to put the links in a protected portion and derive the container class from the class supported. George beshers@carcvax.brc.uconn.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8901280236.aa02065@PARIS.ICS.UCI.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!telly!ddsw1!lll-winken!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!PARIS.ICS.UCI.EDU!beshers%carcvax.brc.uconn.eduShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!telly!ddsw1!lll-winken!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!PARIS.ICS.UCI.EDU!beshers%carcvax.brc.uconn.edu From: beshers%carcvax.brc.uconn.edu@PARIS.ICS.UCI.EDU (George Beshers) Newsgroups: gnu.g++.bug Subject: Re: g++ 1.32 is lax on protection Message-ID: <8901280236.aa02065@PARIS.ICS.UCI.EDU> Date: 27 Jan 89 18:41:26 GMT Sender: daemon@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu Distribution: gnu Organization: GNUs Not Usenet Lines: 7