🚀 go-pugleaf

The following piece of code, if compiled with g++ 1.34.1 using the
-fall-virtual option, will cause the compiler to segfault.

The problem seems to have been that cplus-typeck.c contained an
incorrect test for "constructorness".  A trivial patch is provided
below.  This patch may fix some other related bugs as well.

// Options: -fall-virtual

class base {
public:
	void operator -> () (int, int, ...);
};

class derived : public base {
public:
	derived ();
};

void* p;

int test ()
{
	p = (void*) &derived::derived;		// SEGFAULT
}

*** ../cplus-typeck.c	Wed Mar 15 11:26:44 1989
--- cplus-typeck.c	Mon Mar 27 18:30:50 1989
***************
*** 3471,3475 ****
  		  && (TREE_HAS_METHOD_CALL_OVERLOADED (DECL_CONTEXT (t))
  		      || TREE_NEEDS_WRAPPER (DECL_CONTEXT (t)))
! 		  && ! TREE_IS_CONSTRUCTOR (TREE_TYPE (t))))
  	    {
  	      offset = copy_node (DECL_VINDEX (t));
--- 3471,3475 ----
  		  && (TREE_HAS_METHOD_CALL_OVERLOADED (DECL_CONTEXT (t))
  		      || TREE_NEEDS_WRAPPER (DECL_CONTEXT (t)))
! 		  && ! TREE_IS_CONSTRUCTOR (t)))
  	    {
  	      offset = copy_node (DECL_VINDEX (t));