Article View: gnu.g++.bug
Article #2015uninheritable base classes
From: James Clark
Date: Fri, 19 May 1989 08:50
Date: Fri, 19 May 1989 08:50
23 lines
993 bytes
993 bytes
struct A {
virtual void foo() = 0;
};
struct B : A {
virtual void bar() = 0;
};
struct C : B {
void foo();
void bar();
};
G++ 1.35.0 won't compile this unless I add `virtual void foo() = 0;'
to B. I don't know whether this is a bug, but it strikes me as a bit
unreasonable. I think that a derived class that itself has explicit
uninheritable virtuals should be able to inherit uninheritable
virtuals from a base class, with the inherited virtuals that are
uninheritable in the base class becoming uninheritable in the derived
class.
James Clark
jjc@jclark.uucp
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8905190850.AA09785@jclark.uucp>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!telly!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!UUNET.UU.NET!jclark!jjcShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!telly!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!UUNET.UU.NET!jclark!jjc From: jclark!jjc@UUNET.UU.NET (James Clark) Newsgroups: gnu.g++.bug Subject: uninheritable base classes Message-ID: <8905190850.AA09785@jclark.uucp> Date: 19 May 89 08:50:34 GMT Sender: daemon@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu Distribution: gnu Organization: GNUs Not Usenet Lines: 23