g++ 2.2.2 vs. g++ 1.40

Article View: gnu.g++.bug

Article #215

#215

From: Scott Sutherland
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1992 16:36

21 lines
1179 bytes

It seems that g++ 2 and g++ 1 are not source code compatible.  I can
understand why I need to recompile object files (since the support libraries
have changed), but now I need to include a number of additional header files
that I didn't before.  For example, if I call abs() or exit(), under 
g++ 2.2 I need to include <builtin.h>, which was automatically included
under g++ 1.40.  Did I install it wrong, or is this done on purpose (or is
it a bug)?

Please email as well as post your answer.  My newsfeed is flakey.

	Scott Sutherland
	scott@math.sunysb.edu
	Stony Brook Institute for Mathematical Sciences



-- 

	Scott Sutherland
	scott@math.sunysb.edu
	Stony Brook Institute for Mathematical Sciences

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Aug10.163602.1999@sbcs.sunysb.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!mathlab.mathlab.sunysb.edu!scott

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: gnu.g++.bug
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!mathlab.mathlab.sunysb.edu!scott
From: scott@mathlab.mathlab.sunysb.edu (Scott Sutherland)
Subject: g++ 2.2.2 vs. g++ 1.40
Message-ID: <1992Aug10.163602.1999@sbcs.sunysb.edu>
Sender: gnulists@ai.mit.edu
Organization: SUNY at Stony Brook, Dept. of Math
Distribution: gnu
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1992 16:36:02 GMT
Approved: bug-g++@prep.ai.mit.edu
Lines: 22