Copy constructor/operator= again

Article View: gnu.g++.bug

Article #241

#241

From: Jason Merrill
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1992 10:07

11 lines
714 bytes

In an earlier post I said that the bug wherein g++ doesn't generate the
copy constructor and operator= properly could be avoided simply by
declaring them.

I was wrong; g++ still doesn't generate the code.  Silly me.

Is this bug fixed in 2.2?

--
Jason Merrill
jason@jarthur.claremont.edu

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Apr12.100701.21182@muddcs.claremont.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!jarthur.claremont.edu!jason

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: gnu.g++.bug
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!jarthur.claremont.edu!jason
From: jason@jarthur.claremont.edu (Jason Merrill)
Subject: Copy constructor/operator= again
Message-ID: <1992Apr12.100701.21182@muddcs.claremont.edu>
Sender: gnulists@ai.mit.edu
Organization: Harvey Mudd College
Distribution: gnu
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1992 10:07:01 GMT
Approved: bug-g++@prep.ai.mit.edu
Lines: 13