🚀 go-pugleaf

This code demonstrates the bug:

-----
class Bunk {
    int d;
  public:
    Bunk(int i) { d = i; }
};

main() {
    Bunk b(1);			// works (calls Bunk(int))
    Bunk a(b);			// works (copies b into a w/o fn call)
    Bunk* ap = new Bunk(b);	// ERROR: tries to call Bunk(int) with b
    a = b;			// works
    a.operator=(b);		// ERROR: can't find operator=(Bunk&)
    return 0;
}
-----

Errors:

test.cc: In function `int  main ()':
test.cc:10: bad argument 0 for function `Bunk::Bunk (int)' (type was class
Bunk) 
test.cc:12: no member function `Bunk::operator ='

So the most obvious uses of the copy constructor and operator= are covered.
However, the use of T* = new T(T&) is rather common...

--
Jason Merrill
jason@jarthur.claremont.edu