Article View: gnu.g++.bug
Article #404Re: static functions
From: Doug Schmidt
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 1989 00:32
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 1989 00:32
26 lines
1596 bytes
1596 bytes
In article <8909092351.AA14187@sperm.ocean.washington.edu>, keffer@SPERM (Tom Keffer) writes:
>Michael,
>
> This goes back to an earlier discussion we had as to whether
>-finline-functions should be the default.
>
This reminds me...
Here's another relevant entry from the newly updated documentation from
g++.texinfo:
----------------------------------------
@item -fdefault-inline
If this option is enabled then member functions defined inside class
scope are compiled inline by default, @emph{i.e.,} you don't need to
add @var{inline} in front of the member function name. If this option
is not enabled GNU C++ will not inline member functions by default.
----------------------------------------
Doug
--
schmidt@ics.uci.edu (ARPA) | Per me si va nella citta' dolente.
office: (714) 856-4043 | Per me si va nell'eterno dolore.
| Per me si va tra la perduta gente.
| Lasciate ogni speranza o voi ch'entrate.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1989Sep10.003227.10906@paris.ics.uci.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!orion.cf.uci.edu!uci-ics!newsReferences:
<8909092351.AA14187@sperm.ocean.washington.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!orion.cf.uci.edu!uci-ics!news From: schmidt@zola.ics.uci.edu (Doug Schmidt) Newsgroups: gnu.g++.bug Subject: Re: static functions Message-ID: <1989Sep10.003227.10906@paris.ics.uci.edu> Date: 10 Sep 89 00:32:27 GMT References: <8909092351.AA14187@sperm.ocean.washington.edu> Sender: news@paris.ics.uci.edu (Network News) Reply-To: schmidt@zola.ics.uci.edu (Doug Schmidt) Distribution: gnu Organization: University of California, Irvine - Dept of ICS Lines: 26 In-reply-to: keffer@SPERM.OCEAN.WASHINGTON.EDU (Tom Keffer)