bug/suggestion for static member func

Article View: gnu.g++.bug

Article #487

#487

From: Michael Tiemann
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 1989 23:01

10 lines
924 bytes

The problem you found with protected is commonly though a bug, but it
is the 2.0 way of implementing protected, which is different than the
original, 1.2 way of doing it.

I have implemented static member functions, in version 1.36.0, which
is currently in test release.  Watch this newsgroup for the next
announcement of a test release, or watch info-g++ for the announcement
of the official release.

Michael

Technical Details

Message-ID: <8910092301.AA08709@lurch.Stanford.EDU>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!ucsd!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!LURCH.STANFORD.EDU!tiemann

References: <8910092232.AA14163@cssune.tamu.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!ucsd!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!LURCH.STANFORD.EDU!tiemann
From: tiemann@LURCH.STANFORD.EDU (Michael Tiemann)
Newsgroups: gnu.g++.bug
Subject: bug/suggestion for static member func
Message-ID: <8910092301.AA08709@lurch.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 9 Oct 89 23:01:09 GMT
References: <8910092232.AA14163@cssune.tamu.edu>
Sender: daemon@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu
Reply-To: tiemann@lurch.stanford.edu
Distribution: gnu
Organization: GNUs Not Usenet
Lines: 10

Reply to Parent Message