Article View: gnu.g++.bug
Article #68Re: earlier signal 6 crash
From: Greg Sorensen
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 1989 20:33
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 1989 20:33
15 lines
694 bytes
694 bytes
This bug went away (although the code is not yet correct) if the definition
of class base has a constructor, eg:
class base
{
private:
int tmp=0;
public:
base() {;}
};
With the addition of this constructor, I no longer get the fatal crash.
Removing it again reproduces the crash.
-g.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8906172033.AA20787@imager.mit.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!IMAGER.MIT.EDU!sorensenShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!IMAGER.MIT.EDU!sorensen From: sorensen@IMAGER.MIT.EDU (Greg Sorensen) Newsgroups: gnu.g++.bug Subject: Re: earlier signal 6 crash Message-ID: <8906172033.AA20787@imager.mit.edu> Date: 17 Jun 89 20:33:01 GMT Sender: daemon@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu Distribution: gnu Organization: GNUs Not Usenet Lines: 15